I'm going to be lazy and write a dot point review. Some of these have been cited in other reviews, but what the hell. [b]Pros:[/b] •Batman still packs a punch. No superhero makes for better films. Going from this trilogy to other superhero films is like going from your momma's homemade cuisine to fast food. •I'll admit it, the twist got me. •While no Godfather, the story was engrossing. •Bale got the balance of Batman's voice in this film better. In TDK he probably went a tad overboard. •The acting/casting, particularly Joseph Gordon-Levitt impressed me as I haven't seen much of him. •As with most Batman films, when it was trying to be funny it pulled it off. "So that's what that feels like."-Batman after Catwoman disappears. •The action was again done well (football game), although maybe not matching the previous film's action sequences. In saying this, I always feel like the fight scenes, where the goons are just holding their guns aloft while Batman obliterates them, could be improved. •Bane. Ditto to the above. No villain can beat Ledger's Joker but I liked the voice and he provided a brilliantly menacing figure. It restored some respect to the character after how he was portrayed in 'Batman & Robin'. •Alfred/Michael Caine added a lot of heart. •The amazing score by Hans Zimmer, once again. •I like how the ending was kind of open. When another Batman film eventually gets made, I wouldn't want another beginning. It isn't necessary. Just give us another chapter. That's part of the reason why I'm not anticipating 'Man of Steel' too highly. We just had another reboot. Likewise for the Spider-Man series. •And the most important of all, it had me hooked in for almost three hours. [b]Cons:[/b] •Bane's incomprehensible speech. I've never had to concentrate so much in my life. I missed a lot of what he said on the plane at the beginning before I realised that this was going to require focus. Some have said that they had no problem understanding him, so it could be a cinema sound issue... Edit - It was mostly my dodgy cinema. •To follow on from the above point, the opening scene on the plane doesn't match Joker's bank robbery from TDK, or even the other opening action sequence from TDK, with Batman jumping on the van. •A bit of dialogue. There were a couple of times where I thought, [i]is that the best that they could come up with? I can't remember what was exactly said, but the instance that comes to mind is before Bane and Batman have their final fight. In saying this, the movie is a superhero film, so it's not a large issue. •The pacing is more like 'Batman Begins' than TDK. For me, TDK got the mix between action and building the plot almost as good as an action movie can. •I don't think they showed Bane after he got torpedoed? Was it so it wasn't conclusive as to whether he died or not? It felt a bit anticlimactic. •I'm not completely up with the origins of Selina Kyle/Catwoman, but I'm not sure how I feel about her teaming up in more ways than one with The Dark Knight. •The kiss. The city is about to be blown to shreds! Ain't nobody got time for that! •Bullets and multiple punches to the face do not cause the human body to bleed? We need an M/R rated Batman film. •The 'Nursing home' or 'The Hell', wasn't as bad as it should've been. Also that a young girl could make the jump, but grown men can't. This is the biggest plot issue. They should have mentioned that erosion had occurred or something. Overall, there are some small issues with the movie, and it probably doesn't match certain aspects of TDK, but if you don't try to analyse it too closely and dredge for faults to pick out, it is another great Batman flick, and a very absorbing action film from beginning to end. TDK is widely considered one of the greatest movies and the greatest superhero film, so it's not a fair comparison.

Definitely better than the previous reboot. Largely because the villain is a true foe unlike Lex, whose only weapon is the good old green element unless he is creating Nuclear Man or something. It also creates more tension and eye-catching action. In terms of Superman himself, there is still the problem of him being so strong that even being near defeat doesn't seem to be close in this. The older Superman films did this better. In terms of the characters, no one can top Reeve, but Cavill does a good job as the protagonist. To my surprise, the main adversary General Zod isn't as fearsome as the 'Superman II' version who is a brilliant villain. Apart from the odd quip, Amy Adams doesn't quite feel like the Lois Lane we all know based on how she has been portrayed in numerous mediums in the past either but fits the role fairly well. I was glad they didn't go too heavy on Clark's origins, where it is instead weaved into the story through memories as an adult Superman. Overall, it doesn't add much to what we have seen before, especially when you consider the movie with the same villain from 30 odd years ago is a more engrossing film. For 150 minutes though it didn't feel long and moves along at a good pace. When you think that Superman has been around for about 80 years and has fought countless enemies, it does surprise me that from the six feature films we have seen from Superman, we have had Zod twice, and Lex 4 times + Nuclear Man. Give us something new! Films don't have an expiration date! 3.5-3.

Not a brilliant film, obviously not made with the biggest budget, but it may interest some hip hop fans. The story arc borrows a lot from beefs in hip hop such as Game vs 50, and Pac vs Biggie before that. It also heavily uses the idea that in hip hop rappers act hard and make up false pasts to build a gangster street reputation, and also that record companies are evil. Problems with this as mentioned is that it isn't expensively made with the concert scenes, photoshopped billboard and other things obviously showing this. The acting also leaves some to be desired, and when the actors are in concert it's way way too obvious they are lip-syncing, particularly with Nemesis. The sound seems to have just been put over the top in editing, not uncommon maybe, but here you can easily tell. There is also a funny goof where one of the guys has his shirt on back-to-front - Or maybe that's how they do it in tha hood. Worth checking out though if you want to view some past beefing issues in hip hop in a visual format.

Having just watched Spring Breakers, I'm definitely surprised by the high rating it has. Not so much because I hated it, but I just didn't expect it to be so well received. Some of this movie feels like Girls Gone Wild, the subplot about Selena Gomez's character being religious doesn't go anywhere-maybe there is some vague connection about her rightfully wanting to leave after they go to jail-but really, anyone with sense would've wanted to leave, you wouldn't have to be a believer. Ashley Benson's character doing strange things with a water pistol is odd, to say the least, maybe it's meant to be humorous, there are a number of repetitive scenes and dialogue, like when the "You're Sacred Aren't You"; sentence is retold 10 times, and the plot just isn't that original or entertaining. James Franco does well to be basically unrecognisable as to what looks like an imitation of the joke that is Riff Raff. Not hard to get through, but I definitely didn't connect with it like many have. 2.5-2

This is almost one of those it's so bad it's good films. Bobcat Goldthwait plays a stockbroker named Fred, and unsurprisingly does it as a version of Zed of Police Academy - although a slightly toned down one. John Candy provides the voice of his sidekick, Don the talking horse, who provides Fred with market tips early on in the film that set the scene for the movie. Not a lot works here, particularly enough of Don's jokes, which were apparently improvised by John Candy after the script didn't work well. There are a few moments of laughter though, particularly if you like Bobcat Goldthwait's famous psychotic/neurotic-like character. 1.5-2/5